the high heel kamikaze conundrum, dreary day fun, yahoo’s shine

March 31, 2008 at 11:09 am | In culture, literature, photoshop | Leave a Comment

Why do women wear high heels and why did the kamikaze pilots wear helmets?

The short answer seems to be that women in heels are more likely to attract favourable notice.

In Sense And Sensibility, Jane Austen describes the character Elinor Dashwood as having a “delicate complexion, regular features, and… remarkably pretty figure”.

But Austen describes Elinor’s sister, Marianne, as “still handsomer. Her form, though not so correct as her sister’s, in having the advantage of height, was more striking”.

Heels bestow an artificial tallness and thus an advantage over those who are shorter by nature or lack of heel money. As the writer notes now that most women have the same access to height enhancement and the advantages are thus canceled out why wear them. She suggests that it is because heels are something of a cultural arms race where everyone has to agree all at once to wear sensible shoes. There is probably something to that. On the other hand high heels are part of coming of age, not all that different then getting to wear lip stick. They’re a kind of declaration, the male equivalent might be starting to shave or the opposite, growing a goatee. Much simpler to think about the kamikaze pilots, in tales of yore the equivalent of “suicide pilots”. While their planes were loaded with explosives with orders to take disparate measures to sink enemy ships their commanders also wanted them to survive if possible. Then who knows what problems the pilot might find between take off and the target – so a little head protection to survive and try again another day.

dreary day fun

“If your morals make you dreary, depend upon it they are wrong. I do not say “give them up,” for they may be all you have; but conceal them like a vice, lest they should spoil the lives of better and simpler people.” – Robert Louis Stevenson

Yahoo targets women with new ‘Shine’ site

The front page of Yahoo’s Shine is clean and, at least right now, light on ads.

Yahoo aims to be the top destination site in the lifestyles category, said Amy Iorio, general manager of Lifestyles at Yahoo. Women as a demographic is a good target, particularly given the number of women who use Yahoo (40 million women between the ages of 25 and 54 every month) and the fact that females tend to blog more than males.

“This is really a key audience for Yahoo,” she said. “We’ve been calling them ‘chief household officers’ internally.”

Yahoo’s efforts at doing original content haven’t all panned out, but this site is more of a hybrid. Articles and original blogs will come from a range of sources, including keeping Glamour, Epicurious.com, Style.com, InStyle, Cosmopolitan, Harper’s Bazaar, Women’s Health, and Good Housekeeping.

My eyes rolled a little when I saw Cosmo and Good Housekeeping, but then I clicked over and Tina Fey was on the front page so it can’t be all bad. They do have blogging/article tools so you can damn or praise high heels or pilots that don’t wear their helmets. There weren’t enough blogging/wiki/journal tools out there apparently.

minimizing differences, train platform, trashing your friends

March 30, 2008 at 9:01 am | In culture, photoshop, progressive, rascism, sociology | Leave a Comment

I was reading a few blog entries from a blog here at WordPress that coincidently fit in with the post I was thinking of writing today. I’m not going to link to that blog. To me it would be like rewarding the dog for pissing on my favorite pair of shoes. Post after post Senator Barack Obama was linked to radical Islam, communism and a few other urban myths. The blogger has multiple manipulated photos of Obama and Reverend Wright. One in which Osama Bin Laden and Wright appear to be spiritual kin in their hatred of America. There is no attempt at subtlety. No attempt to parse out the deep differences between anyone the blogger hates. He/she hates the people depicted and that is ultimately all that matters. It was as though someone had put up a case study of the xenophobic mind at work. The Psychology of Prejudice: An Overview

*First, a politically conservative form of authoritarianism, known as “right-wing authoritarianism,” does correlate with prejudice. Well-designed studies in South Africa, Russia, Canada, the U.S., and elsewhere have found that right-wing authoritarianism is associated with a variety of prejudices (Altemeyer, 1996; Duckitt & Farre, 1994; McFarland, Ageyev, & Abalakina, 1993).

* Social dominance orientation tends to correlate with prejudice even more strongly than does right-wing authoritarianism, and studies have linked it to anti-Black and anti-Arab prejudice, sexism, nationalism, opposition to gay rights, and other attitudes concerning social hierarchies (Altemeyer, 1998; Sidanius, Levin, Liu, & Pratto, 2000; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999). Finally, Adorno and his coauthors were correct in pointing out that rigid categorical thinking is a central ingredient in prejudice.

*The most prominent of these theorists was Theodor Adorno, who had fled Nazi Germany and concluded that the key to prejudice lay in what he called an “authoritarian personality.” In his book The Authoritarian Personality, Adorno and his coauthors (1950) described authoritarians as rigid thinkers who obeyed authority, saw the world as black and white, and enforced strict adherence to social rules and hierarchies. Authoritarian people, they argued, were more likely than others to harbor prejudices against low-status groups.

* Despite the usefulness of categories in everyday life, they can be devastating when people falsely isolate themselves from the environment, from animals and nature, or from each other. For a vivid illustration of this point, we need only look at the social construction of racial categories. In the United States, for example, at least 75% of African Americans have White ancestry, and 1-5% of the genes carried by American Whites are from African ancestors (Davis, 1991).

* An intriguing and important consequence of categorical thinking is its tendency to distort perceptions. Typically, these distortions take the form of minimizing differences within categories (“assimilation”) and exaggerating differences between categories (“contrast”). – (all emphasis mine)

That blogger would love the introduction to the Overview though would probably be disappointed with the material that follows. The OV takes Bin Laden to task for displaying clear indications of an authoritarian personality that greatly oversimplifies when it comes to characterizing western culture and the U.S. in particular. While I didn’t need the refresher myself they didn’t do what that blogger did, they didn’t over simplify, they didn’t ignore facts that may have weakened their case. They didn’t exaggerate differences. Like the small daily white lie that we all tell, categorizing people is a difficult if not impossible phenomenon to stop altogether. Though there is a point at which adhering blindly to a structured and authoritarian world view crosses the line into something destructive and immoral. Its a force that pushes outward, the only purpose of which is the destruction of the imagined enemy. I have huge issues with Catholic orthodoxy, but I would never think of making the accusations made by Senator McCain’s supporter Christian fundamentalist preacher John Hagee that Catholic Church is a”Great Whore” and “false cult system”; and has blamed Jews  for the Holocaust. In recent years this psychology was expressed by one George Bush in one short sentence, “You’re either with us or against us.” No room for details, justifications, reasoned discourse. Authority and strict categories. If you start thinking, if you don’t give in those those base emotions then you’re one of them too. If truth and facts become roadkill along the way to fulfilling whatever goal the privileged all knowing patriotically correct hierarchy has in its sights this week that is just a price that must be paid for some supposedly greater good.

A little disclaimer, my defense of Obama is not an endorsement.

train platform 

On the lighter side. I’ve heard of guys leaving their drunk friend on their parents or wife’s doorstep, ringing the buzzer and running, but someone might have gone a little too far.  Drunken man awakes inside garbage truck

 William M. Bowen woke up after a night of drinking with friends and realized he was inside a commercial trash-collection truck full of waste.

The driver had just emptied a commercial trash bin into his truck and was about to activate its compactor when he heard Bowen screaming.

Though Bowen was a few seconds short of being crashed to death he wouldn’t tell police who his drinking buddies were. Tough call, his friends pushed the never rat rule it its limit.

parents let daughter die, western spring, flat earthers and the threat of nipple rings

March 28, 2008 at 10:38 am | In Philosophy & Religion, culture, legal, news, photography, photoshop, progressive | Leave a Comment

Parents pick prayer over docstors

Police are investigating an 11-year-old girl’s death from an undiagnosed, treatable form of diabetes after her parents chose to pray for her rather than take her to a doctor.

An autopsy showed Madeline Neumann died Sunday of diabetic ketoacidosis, a condition that left too little insulin in her body, Everest Metro Police Chief Dan Vergin said.

She had probably been ill for about a month, suffering symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, excessive thirst, loss of appetite and weakness, the chief said Wednesday, noting that he expects to complete the investigation by Friday and forward the results to the district attorney.

The girl’s mother, Leilani Neumann, said that she and her family believe in the Bible and that healing comes from God, but that they do not belong to an organized religion or faith, are not fanatics and have nothing against doctors. (emphasis mine)

madeline-kara-neumann.jpg

Fanaticism isn’t always some wild eyed angry nut case. Sometimes its quiet. It speaks softly and may seem reasonable. Apparently a sister-in-law tried to persuade the family and the police that something should be done a few days to a week before Madeline died. The father should certainly have known better considering that he was a police officer at one point. Madeline’s mother told AP that she wasn’t worried about an investigation because “our lives are in God’s hands”. This would also and not for the first time bring up the limits of freedom of religion especially as it pertains to children.

western spring 

If The Age of Reason was a bus obviously some people missed it and refuse to board regardless of how many times it comes around, Iraqi astronomer goes on TV to explain why Earth is flat

Remember how adamant King George was the TSA (Transportation Security Administration) not be unionized. Maybe because a unionized TSA would insist on a little more competence then displayed here, Woman Says TSA Forced Piercings Removal

A Texas woman who said she was forced to remove a nipple ring with pliers in order to board an airplane called Thursday for an apology by federal security agents and a civil rights investigation.

eastern influences, a better business model, cheery blossom

March 27, 2008 at 11:00 am | In economic, news, photography, photoshop, progressive | Leave a Comment

eastern influences

Not by way of endorsing a candidate, but some interesting micro-economics, Creating a World Without Poverty

Social Business

Presently, the dominant business for is the profit-maximizing business (PMB). Yunus proposes an alternative, and its promotion is the main goal of the book: the social business. A social business is a business, it is not a charity, it is not a non-profit. It operates on business principles and aims to cover its own costs, rather than rely on other funding as charities do. The difference between a social business and PMB is that the explicit goal of a social business is to solve a social problem, meet a social need and provide a social benefit. The product or service offered by a social business is not free. It charges a fee (and it can be extremely low fees) in order to cover its costs in order to be self-sustaining and to potentially grow and expand (much as Grameen Bank has done).

The major difference here is that the principle of profit maximization is replaced with the principle of social benefit. The success of a social business will not be measured by the size of its profits or the dividends distributed to its investors but how much of a positive impact it has had in solving, or at least alleviating, the social problem it was created to solve.

The general idea which I’ll proceed to do an injustice in such few words, is that we’ve gotten the paradigm about business wrong. Looking out for profits, or more accurately the maximization of profits and what social improvements that followed many were happy to take credit for, but which were not the manifest goal of most of those seeking the profit. This was called the “greed is good” model and still is by some. A little selfishness is inevitable and may in some cases have benefits, but ultimately unbridled greed has a tendency to empty the pantry without thinking about the consequences.

cheery blossom. it was supposed to be cherry blossom, but i liked the typo.

some people say they love their children even as they backhand them across the room. a similar mentality at work here, Military tells Bush of troop strains

Behind the Pentagon’s closed doors, U.S. military leaders told President Bush they are worried about the Iraq war’s mounting strain on troops and their families. But they indicated they’d go along with a brief halt in pulling out troops this summer.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.