yellow train 3209, fundamentalists trip over science again, chris matthews swagger lover

March 30, 2007 at 11:28 am | In Philosophy & Religion, culture, graphic art, media, science | Leave a Comment

yellow train 3209

update: the train photo link should be fixed. please remember that the images here are rights managed and they are only for your personal use as wallpaper or to experiment with in photoshop.

Articles like these are brain bombs for certain people. They’ve backed themselves into an ideological corner based on dogma trumping rationalism or even simple humanity for that matter. Now the same people will somehow have to fit another bend into their pretzel to rationalize old positions when faced with new choices made possible through science, Genetics and gaysA theologian’s article raises issues of faith on two major fronts

The issues of man’s link to global warming and a genetic link to homosexuality have this in common: While they are each debatable, the preponderance of scientific evidence and thought supports both claims.

The issues also have this in common: Some evangelical Christians accept both theories.

High-profile ministers like Rick Warren and groups like the Evangelical Environmental Network have accepted man’s responsibility for increasing global warming and want to address it. Many other evangelicals see things differently. But this isn’t a make-or-break issue of faith.

Whether homosexuality is genetic, rather than learned, behavior, however, is a defining issue of faith for many. And that’s what makes a recent article by the Rev. Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, so unexpected. Mohler says Christians must be prepared to accept scientific data that homosexual predispositions are genetically engendered.

As you can imagine, this has caused furor in some circles.

And so has Mohler’s related pronouncement: If science can find ways to “treat” homosexuality prenatally, it’s something Christians should consider.

Mohler’s argument produces a plethora of problems for fundamentalist Christians far beyond any genetic cause.

If it is genetically produced, does this mean God countenances it?

Can fundamentalists who oppose stem-cell research acquiesce to prenatal genetic manipulation? What’s the difference?

Is there a difference between treating physical ailments, such as autism, genetically as opposed to socially debatable activities, like homosexuality? Most people would say “yes” in a heartbeat.

Kind of a part two to what liberal media? The Many Man-Crushes of Chris Matthews

Matthews’s man-crush on Bush continued longer than that of most of the mainstream media, leading him, for instance, to assert that “everybody sort of likes the President, except for the real whack-jobs,” at a moment when the percentage of Americans telling New York Times/CBS pollsters that they “liked” Bush had fallen to 37 percent.

But nobody, save Fred Barnes, thinks Bush is cool anymore, and so Matthews has had to go cruising for a new crush. For a while it looked as if he and John McCain would hook up. “A lot of people,” he explained coyly, naming no names, “like the cut of John McCain’s jib, his independence, his maverick reputation.” This led Matthews to declare the election all but over, announcing that as far as he was concerned, McCain “deserves the presidency.”

That Matthews passes for a centrist is testament to how far far Right the national punditry has moved. The biggest problem with Matthews isn’t man-love for Republicans with “swagger”  it’s a pathetic lack of insight into culture, politics and last but not least what a representative liberal democracy like ours is supposed to be. The only values that Chris seems to have are the ones written into his lucrative contracts. I get the impression he doesn’t care what he says as long as he generates controversy which in turn gets viewers. Its not punditry or insight, its devil’s advocate for fun and profit. That he hurts rather then helps America isn’t even part of Chris’s calculations.

photo: new found leaf, what liberal media, its not you its you’re apartment

March 29, 2007 at 10:52 am | In culture, media, photography, progressive | Leave a Comment

new found leaf - wallpaper. link fixed.

Progress Report: Media Think They Know Best

MEDIA: AMERICANS DON’T WANT ACCOUNTABILITY: Speaking about the U.S. attorney scandal last week, CNBC chief Washington correspondent John Harwood claimed that “[i]nvestigating the Bush administration is a lot easier than passing new laws,” and cautioned that “[o]ne danger for Democrats is whether they look too political in exploiting this.” The next day, NBC’s Brian Williams “paraphrased” Harwood’s comments, saying, “I can’t help but wonder if the Democrats are finding it a little easier to investigate than legislate.” Time magazine managing editor Richard Stengel chimed in this weekend. “I am so uninterested in the Democrats wanting Karl Rove, because it is so bad for them,” he said, ignoring the fact that criticism of Rove and calls for him to testify have been bipartisan.

If its the broadcast media in particular it leans conservative both in political terms and conservative in the sense of being cautious about offending the fringe Right. The media will be liberal when it starts being fair, but more importantly when it does its homework and really digs into the facts. The media ( and not just the ultra Conservative Fox) has devoted more air time to Anna Nicole Smith’s death then they have to the scandalous conditions of Walter-Reed military hospital. If this morning is like the average morning I will hear more about the new shoe styles for spring then the environment, middle-class jobs/wages, or the consequences of our huge national debt on our children.

Have we all seen the Seinfeld episode a dozen times by now about the “It’s not you its me” break-up line – It’s Not You, It’s Your Apartment

DATING is fraught with disappointments, so you can imagine how delighted a single woman might be to find someone like Albert Podell — particularly after she Googles him and learns how rich he is. Last year, Mr. Podell, a 70-year-old lawyer, gave N.Y.U. Law School $2.9 million. He goes out four nights a week, to the opera, symphony or theater. He is well read. He says he has traveled to 162 countries.

Then comes that magic evening when the woman is ready to go back to his place.

“It’s totally unchanged, like it was when I went to law school in 1973, a time warp,” Mr. Podell says of his small one-bedroom in SoHo, a description that seems plausible, given the hot pink living room with the futon seating and the fraying contact paper on the kitchen cabinets.

The place is also dimly lighted, which, once you examine the kitchen nook in daylight, is probably not such a bad thing. The cabinets hold nothing but a six-month supply of powdered milk for Mr. Podell’s cereal, so that he can keep his trips to the supermarket to a minimum; the Formica countertop is peeling; the stove has been disconnected from the gas feed. (Mr. Podell, who usually eats out, sees no reason to waste fuel.)

All these things have proved detriments to love, but none so effectively as his sheets. Mr. Podell likes the ones from the ’60s and ’70s that tell a story: sheets with intergalactic battles or pink hippopotami or the Beatles.

photoshop:ghost train, jetson’s apartment complex on the way, secretive plan to gut endangered species act

March 28, 2007 at 10:46 am | In animals, art, culture, environmental, photoshop, progressive | Leave a Comment

ghost train. I used a commercial action from Kubota – Artistic actions Volume II – antique with glow. It does tend blow out most of the color so first I duped the layer and selected multiply for layer properties which gave me an intense saturation to start with.

OMA designs Residential Tower in Singapore or as I like to call it The Jetson’s Apartment Complex

Four individual apartment towers are vertically offset from one another and suspended from a central core. The skyline of floating towers directly relates to the surrounding building volumes and explores the most attractive views towards the city center and an extensive green zone to the north. The lifted apartment towers reduce the building’s footprint to a minimum; the liberated ground level provides communal leisure activities embedded in the tropical landscape.

I had occasion a few years ago to read up a little on the literal nuts, bolts and stresses involved in structural engineering and this building seems to test the limits of what is possible.

Inside the secretive plan to gut the Endangered Species Act 

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is maneuvering to fundamentally weaken the Endangered Species Act, its strategy laid out in an internal 117-page draft proposal obtained by Salon. The proposed changes limit the number of species that can be protected and curtail the acres of wildlife habitat to be preserved. It shifts authority to enforce the act from the federal government to the states, and it dilutes legal barriers that protect habitat from sprawl, logging or mining.

“The proposed changes fundamentally gut the intent of the Endangered Species Act,” says Jan Hasselman, a Seattle attorney with Earthjustice, an environmental law firm, who helped Salon interpret the proposal. “This is a no-holds-barred end run around one of America’s most popular environmental protections. If these regulations stand up, the act will no longer provide a safety net for animals and plants on the brink of extinction.”

At this point many of us have heard someone piss and moan about how the ESA has caused them some kind of hardship. I genuinely sympathize and maybe it is time to have a good rational scientifically informed revisit of the Endangered Species Act by our elected representatives. It is not time to sneak around our legislators and try to shove some radical fringe ideas down the publics throat through some bureaucratic back door..

pink’s tattoos, human skin is an anthropologist’s tool, creating a culture of fear

March 27, 2007 at 10:29 am | In culture, photography, photoshop, progressive, science | 1 Comment

pink’s tattoos. Better seen full size as usual – they include a swan racing toward a shooting star. The lyrics to a song, a bull dog, and some kind of tattoo bracelet.

Human skin is an anthropologist’s map

QUESTION: And what have you found?

JABLONSKI: That skin is the most underappreciated of our organs.

Unless we’re having the sort of problem that brings us to a dermatologist, we take our skin for granted. We never think of it as working very hard for our body or doing valuable things for us socially.

But when you really start thinking about it, it’s a factory that produces vitamin D, sweat, hormones, oils, wax, pigments — substances we need. Skin is a raincoat in that it protects us from water, bugs and noxious chemicals. It’s also a billboard which we adorn with powder, tattoos, piercing and scars to give off instant messages about our history, health, values and availability for mating.

On an evolutionary level, there are three remarkable facts about skin. It comes in colors, of course. Compared to other mammals, our skin is relatively hairless. And it’s sweaty. In the last few million years, humans became the sweatiest of mammals.

QUESTION: Is that important?

JABLONSKI: Absolutely. It’s often said that our large brains are what made it possible for us to evolve from ape to human. But those big brains could never have developed if we didn’t have exceptionally sweaty skin.

It happened this way. There was a tremendous takeoff in human evolution about 2 million years ago when primates who could no longer be called apes appeared in the savannahs of East Africa. These early humans ran long distances in open areas. In order to survive in the equatorial sun, they needed to cool their brains. Early humans evolved an increased number of sweat glands for that purpose, which in turn permitted their brain size to expand. As soon as we developed larger brains, our planning capacity increased, and this allowed people to disperse out of Africa. There’s fossil evidence of humans appearing in Central Asia around this time.

Part of a longer interview about the role skin has played in human evolution – no skin and perspiration equals no brains or no cosmetics industry or tattoo business.

winter mountain landscape 1600×1200 as promised.

Terrorized by ‘War on Terror’ or how we let a few people turn us into a nation of chicken littles.

But the little secret here may be that the vagueness of the phrase was deliberately (or instinctively) calculated by its sponsors. Constant reference to a “war on terror” did accomplish one major objective: It stimulated the emergence of a culture of fear. Fear obscures reason, intensifies emotions and makes it easier for demagogic politicians to mobilize the public on behalf of the policies they want to pursue. The war of choice in Iraq could never have gained the congressional support it got without the psychological linkage between the shock of 9/11 and the postulated existence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Support for President Bush in the 2004 elections was also mobilized in part by the notion that “a nation at war” does not change its commander in chief in midstream. The sense of a pervasive but otherwise imprecise danger was thus channeled in a politically expedient direction by the mobilizing appeal of being “at war.”

To justify the “war on terror,” the administration has lately crafted a false historical narrative that could even become a self-fulfilling prophecy. By claiming that its war is similar to earlier U.S. struggles against Nazism and then Stalinism (while ignoring the fact that both Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were first-rate military powers, a status al-Qaeda neither has nor can achieve), the administration could be preparing the case for war with Iran. Such war would then plunge America into a protracted conflict spanning Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and perhaps also Pakistan.

The culture of fear is like a genie that has been let out of its bottle. It acquires a life of its own — and can become demoralizing. America today is not the self-confident and determined nation that responded to Pearl Harbor; nor is it the America that heard from its leader, at another moment of crisis, the powerful words “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself”; nor is it the calm America that waged the Cold War with quiet persistence despite the knowledge that a real war could be initiated abruptly within minutes and prompt the death of 100 million Americans within just a few hours. We are now divided, uncertain and potentially very susceptible to panic in the event of another terrorist act in the United States itself.

Good decent ordinary people – our friends, family and neighbors have been so easily manipulated it is a little scary. It was relatively simple – get the bad guys responsible for 9-11, not turn that objective into a never ending military and culture clash. Then on top of that accuse anyone that thinks things have been bungled of being sympathetic to terrorists. It is like an absurd comic book made in some war nerds basement come to life.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.